The AI in Classes Experiment - Current Status

Author(s): Brandy A. B. Perkl, Ph.D. - Feel free to use/adapt with credit! | Originally posted: December 17, 2024

1) Disclosures are now required for all assignments.

AI disclosures are required for every assignment—even if you did not use AI tools.

2) My AI Policy (In Plain Terms):

You may use AI on ANY assignment, but ONLY with active transparency.

There is no penalty for using AI unless:

3) What Active Transparency Looks Like:

Get Consent: Before you use AI in a group project or breakout room, make sure everyone's on board. Respect different viewpoints and make sure no one feels left out. Using AI without the group’s consent can break trust and harm your reputation as a collaborative and ethical leader.

Cite or Reflect: When not in a team or when turning in your work - briefly explain how and when you used AI. You can include this in your assignment via...

Example - Actively Transparent AI Disclosure:

ChatGPT was used to refine/reduce words after my initial independent brainstorming and drafting. Final editing was completed independently.

Example - No AI used Disclosure:

No AI was used in any steps of the work for this assignment, excepting built-in spelling and grammar checking on Google Sites where this is published.

4) Why This Matters (My Hope):

My goal is to help us learn together:

As leadership students, you may find it valuable to critique how well AI supported your work (e.g., where it helped vs. where it fell short). This insight will prepare you for leading and participating with real-world applications.

5) Possible Penalties for Improper Use (Let’s Avoid This):

If you simply reproduce AI-generated content without citation, reflection, or critique, I reserve the right to:

6) AI Detection Tools:

Note: Your written work may be checked using AI-detection tools. These tools help predict if content was created by a generative AI/large-language model like ChatGPT.

7) My Pledge to You:

I will approach grading with fairness and transparency.

If there are concerns about AI use, we will have an opportunity to discuss it. My goal is to support your learning, not create stress over the origins of your work.

Questions?

If any part of this policy is unclear, please reach out before submitting your work. Let’s make this a semester of exploration, learning, and ethical AI use!

2.1) The 'official words' version of the policy above:

Related University resources can be found here: Artificial Intelligence in Teaching and Learning

In this course you are welcome and expected to use generative artificial intelligence/large language model tools, e.g. ChatGPT, Dall-e, Bard, Perplexity. Using these tools aligns with my teaching goal of training leaders for our current and future society.

Important Caveat: Be aware that other classes will have different policies and some may forbid AI use altogether! When prohibited or not in compliance with a course's policy, usage could result in violations of the Honor Code and have actional consequences at the class, college, or University level.  

So, you're ready to use AI? Then you need to:

Practice Self-Leadership:

Start by asking yourself :

🔖You can also use this list to think it through + guide checking your AIs work when you use it!

Why this matters:

You’re investing time and money in these courses to develop skills and knowledge. If AI shortcuts that process, you risk missing out on the learning outcomes you’re paying to achieve.

The greater the involvement of AI in your work—especially in critical thinking tasks—the greater the risks:

Ethical AI Use = Leadership Integrity

Ethical AI use isn’t just about avoiding penalties—it’s about building trust and showing integrity. These habits:

By using AI responsibly, you reinforce your role as a self-led learner and future leader.

And Keep (or develop) Your Voice:

In leadership over the past decade+, there has been a continual push for more transparent, authentic leaders. These leaders are often most distinguishable and prized for their 'voice'. Great leaders are often prized for their ability to help others see and share in a goal while illuminating the path to achieve it. Their words feel real and alive, sparking connection and shared purpose.

AI tools, while helpful in some respects, struggle to create this kind of authenticity. Their outputs often lack the emotional resonance and originality needed to inspire and unite people around a vision. I encourage you not to surrender your voice to save time or effort.

Why This Matters:

Excerpt from Prof. Loewe of St. Edward's University's Policy for Ethical Use of Generative AI Technologies... (Loewe, 2023) "...Maybe GAIs will give you a useful suggestion, organizational idea, or other help, but their outputs, especially in well-established genres, are often bland pabulum—or worse. GAIs such as Chat GPT and Bard are trained on text found online. You already know from using the Internet that much of what appears online is wrong, banal, or generated by copycats; is glib brand-building fluff, clickbait trash, or political hype; or is written in a voice-of-the-committee style. As a result of the training data, some GAI output is like an OK-looking but ultimately unsatisfying (or even slightly gross) gumbo made from mystery ingredients. GAIs are interesting tools that can help you improve your writing in some ways, but you retain both the privileges and the responsibilities of a human being who can make choices in using words..." 

The Leadership Takeaway:

AI can be a useful tool, but you are the leader—you have the privilege and responsibility to shape your words and ideas into something uniquely your own. Authenticity is the cornerstone of trust and connection, so use AI to support your work, not define it.

Why AI at all?? Because it's an emerging skill.

Learning to use AI is an emerging skill, and those who develop competencies in this skill will likely be sought out over those who do not for future employment (particularly those with 'prompt engineering skills'; Visé & Klar, 2023).  

If you want to know more including Ideal Class Uses, Limits, Ethics, links to types of GAI for different uses, etc., you can explore Pt. 1 of this experiment, here: https://www.brandyabrown.com/posts/the-ai-in-classes-experiment-pt-1-fall-2023 

We’ll also explore and discuss AI usage together in class, so stay curious and engaged as we navigate this exciting (and sometimes tricky) toolset! 

Acknowledgements + AI Disclosure

In this latest round of this experiment, I did use GAI to REFINE this page from my prior versions (those can be accessed via the subpages on this site) - I am wordy by nature and trade and often benefit from that kind of extra editor to be more clear + concise. The original content and intent are my own, though ChatGPT served as an editor for me on December 17, 2024.

Ethics in Practice:

This page draws on resources shared by other educators working collaboratively to adapt to AI in the classroom. I gratefully acknowledge their contributions and welcome others to adapt and build on my work in a similar spirit. For example: Here is an ideal list of what to consider for ethics that I use to refine/guide these conversations.

Eaton, L. (Ed.). (n.d.). Classroom policies for AI Generative Tools. Crowd-Sourced Classroom Policies for AI Generative Tools. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RMVwzjc1o0Mi8Blw_-JUTcXv02b2WRH86vw7mi16W3U/edit?fbclid=IwAR1J1sSmlMv6YStCrn25JJINaEHcCHWbz9Trm1Vw-ot-xOf1tNIRjrvI70M

References

Loewe, D. M. (2023, July 15). Policy for ethical use of Generative AI Technologies. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1onwUP12kIqcU2-s-xjEMY-UJ4cWf-8xApCE3gxTcQB0/edit 

McAdoo, T. (2023, April 7). How to cite chatgpt. American Psychological Association. https://apastyle.apa.org/blog/how-to-cite-chatgpt

Visé, D. de, & Klar, R. (2023, April 18). Nine in 10 companies want employees with Chatgpt Skills. The Hill. https://thehill.com/policy/technology/3955384-ai-employees-companies-chatgpt-skills/ 

Image sourced from Adobe's Stock (licensed via UArizona). | University  of Arizona Privacy Statement